Young Academic can today bring you news that the Vice-Chancellor of the University of East London has rejected the government’s claims that their higher education reforms would increase choice for students. In essential education news, he went on to warn many students that they face only the choice between a ‘no-frills’ degree or none at all.
Professor Patrick McGhee said “Many students will face the stark choice between accepting a cut-price degree done on the cheap or not entering higher education at all. While many further education colleges offer excellent teaching, even the best FE college is no substitute for a student who wants to study a research-led degree on a university campus, with all the opportunities that provides. The new scheme will reduce the number of students going to higher education, create an unsustainable burden for the taxpayer, increase uncertainty and bureaucracy for universities, and undermine the reputation of British higher education internationally.”
The government scheme takes 20,000 existing places from universities across the country and reallocates them to universities and further education colleges charging fees of less than £7,500 a year. Most of these places went to FE colleges – an increase of 25% over their current numbers. Meanwhile, many universities will have to reject qualified students to meet lower government allocations. Despite enjoying record-breaking applications over the last few years, UEL will have to turn away over 1,000 students this summer who would otherwise have places.
Professor McGhee continued “Unless you are amongst that small group with very high traditional A-levels with well-off parents who can fund living costs in any part of the country, the new scheme actually reduces choice due to the drastic cuts in total number of places. If you are on good to average A-level grades, want to study near where you live, or have care responsibilities you have many fewer choices. If you are deterred from higher education or the place you want has been cut by the government, the consequences of these new policies are utterly, utterly disastrous.”
“This ill-considered experiment with one of the best higher education systems in the world is untested, unsupported, underdefined, unsustainable and unnecessary. It would be bad enough if we were talking about tin can production, but we’re talking here about young people’s lives.”
Many students are expected to never fully repay their loans – the government says it is writing off 34p in the pound – which suggests the purpose of allocating extra places to cheaper degrees is to save money for the Treasury, not increase student choice.